Pres. Obama gives orders to ASSASSINATE US Citizens

By Glenn Greenwald

When it comes to Obama’s assassination power, he has repeatedly refused to disclose the principal legal memoranda prepared by Obama OLC lawyers that justified his kill list. Obama is, right now, vigorously resisting lawsuits from the New York Times and the ACLU to obtain that OLC memorandum. In sum, Obama not only claims he has the power to order US citizens killed with no transparency, but that even the documents explaining the legal rationale for this power are to be concealed. He’s maintaining secret law on the most extremist power he can assert.

If the Obama administration simply asserts without evidence or trial that someone is a terrorist, then they are assumed to be, and they can then be punished as such – with indefinite imprisonment, torture or death.z_drone_strike000

NO EVIDENCE- NO PROBLEM

It is justifying the due-process-free execution of people secretly accused by the president and his underlings, with no due process, of being that. The distinction between (a) government accusations and (b) proof of guilt is central to every free society, by definition, yet this memo – and those who defend Obama’s assassination power – willfully ignore it.

The definition of an extreme authoritarian is one who is willing blindly to assume that government accusations are true without any evidence presented or opportunity to contest those accusations.

Due process is guaranteed in the Constitution and judicial review of government accusations has been a staple of western justice since the Magna Carta: because leaders can’t be trusted to decree guilt and punish citizens without evidence.

The memo explicitly leaves open the possibility that presidential assassinations of US citizens may be permissible even when the target is not a senior al-Qaida leader posing an imminent threat and/or when capture is feasible.

There are no geographic limits to the president’s authority to kill anyone he wants. This power applies not only to war zones, but everywhere in the world that he claims a member of al-Qaida is found. This memo embraces and institutionalizes the core Bush/Cheney theory that justified the entire panoply of policies Democrats back then pretended to find so objectionable.z_constitution

The president’s assassination power “does not require that the US have clear evidence that a specific attack . . . will take place in the immediate future“. The US routinely assassinates its targets not when they are engaged in or plotting attacks but when they are at home, with family members, riding in a car, at work, at funerals, rescuing other drone victims, etc.

The legal framework adopted by the memo means the president can kill anyone he claims is a member of al-Qaida regardless of where they are found or what they are doing.

The memo is so vague and broad that it provides no real limits on the president’s assassination power.

Treating this document as though it confers any authority on Obama is like treating the statements of one’s own lawyer as a judicial finding or jury verdict.

IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION- USE IT TO WIPE YOUR ASS, NO ONE CARES

Indeed, recall the primary excuse used to shield Bush officials from prosecution for their crimes of torture and illegal eavesdropping: namely, they got Bush-appointed lawyers in the DOJ to say that their conduct was legal, and therefore, it should be treated as such. This tactic – getting partisan lawyers and underlings of the president to say that the president’s conduct is legal – was appropriately treated with scorn when invoked by Bush officials to justify their radical programs. As Digby wrote about Bush officials who pointed to the OLC memos it got its lawyers to issue about torture and eavesdropping, such a practice amounts to:

“validating the idea that obscure Justice Department officials can be granted the authority to essentially immunize officials at all levels of the government, from the president down to the lowest field officer, by issuing a secret memo. This is a very important new development in western jurisprudence and one that surely requires more study and consideration. If Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan had known about this, they could have saved themselves a lot of trouble.”

Life-long Democratic Party lawyers are not going to oppose the terrorism policies of the president who appointed them. A president can always find underlings and political appointees to endorse whatever he wants to do. That’s all this memo is: the by-product of obsequious lawyers telling their Party’s leader that he is (of course) free to do exactly that which he wants to do, in exactly the same way that Bush got John Yoo to tell him that torture was not torture, and that even it if were, it was legal.

That’s why courts, not the president’s partisan lawyers, should be making these determinations. But when the ACLU tried to obtain a judicial determination as to whether Obama is actually authorized to assassinate US citizens, the Obama DOJ went to extreme lengths to block the court from ruling on that question. They didn’t want independent judges to determine the law. They wanted their own lawyers to do so.z_obama000

That’s all this memo is: Obama-loyal appointees telling their leader that he has the authority to do what he wants. But in the warped world of US politics, this – secret memos from partisan lackeys – has replaced judicial review as the means to determine the legality of the president’s conduct.

ONE CORRUPT PARTY OR THE OTHER

The core freedom most under attack by the War on Terror is the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process. It provides that “no person shall be . . . deprived of life . . . without due process of law”. Like putting people in cages for life on island prisons with no trial, claiming that the president has the right to assassinate US citizens far from any battlefield without any charges or trial is the supreme evisceration of this right.

“Trial by jury, trial by fire, rock, paper scissors, who cares? Due process just means that there is a process that you do. The current process is apparently, first the president meets with his advisers and decides who he can kill. Then he kills them.” Stephen Colbert

DOJ WHITE PAPER

Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Q… by   Mike Riggs

We can no longer in good conscience trust the criminals to police themselves. Link to this article from forums and blogs. Mention it with links in your comments on blogs. PROMOTE IT.
 .
PLEASE SHARE- Re-Post to Reddit, Digg, Facebook, Twitter, etc. (below)
.
.
Related articles:
.
Civil Disobedience actions going on now you can join 2014
.
How many other American citizens are on Obama’s KILL LIST?
.
FOLLOW the MONEY: Democrats who oppose Keystone own shares in competing companies
.
The largest mental health center in America is a JAIL
.
LAPD Tased Man’s Genitals Till He Could “Smell His Flesh Burning”
.
Strike Updates: War on Anonymous
.
Strike Updates: American Spring
.
I Would Lead A Coup Against The U.S. Government
.
Obama’s Corporate Plantations: Deregulation, Privatization and Cheap Labor

.
.
Obamas Executive Assassination Wing
.
FBI Successfully Foils Another FBI Plot

.
One corrupt party or the other
.
This Bill provides the president the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without benefit of their Constitutional rights
.
President Obama says he will keep the NSA spying on Americans
.
Obama Defends Right to Take All Your Phone Records
.
FBI says the Government Is Spying on Americans with Drones, Too
.
Don’t ask your government for your Privacy, take it back:

5 comments

  1. People, it’s about time we realize the truth: the people are NOT in control of their own government. Our government is being run by bankers, corporations and the ultra-rich elites. If we want our government back, we MUST unify and organize together to restore our cherished Constitution.

    These criminals working in our government belong in prison or to be executed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s